why does the kjv have extra verses why does the kjv have extra verses

Answer (1 of 6): It means that the text, word, that you are seeing wasn't there in the original text that KJV was written from. In some copies, however, this also is added 'Now when He was risen early [on] the first day of the week, He appeared first to Mary Magdalene '." 1785] collated by Matthai. Scrivener, usually regarded as a defender of the KJV text, said of this verse, "The authenticity of [this verse] will, perhaps, no longer be maintained by anyone whose judgment ought to have weight; but this result has been arrived at after a long and memorable controversy, which helped keep alive, especially in England, some interest in Biblical studies. However some other, equally old resources, such as the C codex, and several cursives, change one word to make the verse read, "Notwithstanding it pleased Silas that they should abide there still. In addition to this, there is the fact that Greek Orthodox Churches (especially) have a more fluid (less formal or legalistic) notion of how the idea of a "canonical book" should be applied. Thus the actual number of verses in the ESV is less than 31,103. In the least, this puts the matter in a bit of a different light. ", "Acts 8:37 Faith Before Baptism Omitted in NIV", https://archive.org/stream/thetextandcanon00soutuoft#page/32/mode/2up, "2 Corinthians 13:12 Greet one another with a holy kiss! Second, when Scott details a handful of changes that are indeed trivial, he says, Friends, this is the ENTIRE extent of the nature of the changes from the King James Bible of 1611 to the King James Bible of the present day. As we mentioned above, that is not correct. Hebrews 13:16 - But to do good and to communicate forget not: for with such sacrifices God is well pleased. (Malachi 1:12) No tetragrammaton, but capitalised LORD in KJV. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. The pericope does not appear in the oldest Codexes , A,B,C,L,N,T,W,X,,, nor in papyri p66 or p75, nor in minuscules 33, 157, 565, 892, 1241, or 1424 nor in the Peshitta. Whether those errors crept into handwritten copies or printed copies, the principle is still the same. Dr. Bruce Metzger points out that The corruption of tree into book had occurred earlier in the transmission of the Latin text when a scribe accidentally miscopied the correct word ligno (tree) as libro (book).6 Thus, a handwritten error that originated in Latin found its way into the first published Greek New Testament and consequently into the KJV. What was the intended meaning of the quotation marks around "sinners" in the old NIV? In printed Bibles this system made its first appearance in the first two Bomberg editions of 1518. Moreover, in the various manuscripts in which the passage appears, it presents a much greater number of variations[133] than an equal portion of the New Testament so much so, that it would seem that there are three distinct versions of the pericope. [118] The stylistic differences suggest that none of these was written by the author of the Gospel of St. Mark. Amen. In particular, spelling standardization is the largest single group of changes made between 1611 and the modern era. "[147], B = bracketed in the main text The translation team and most biblical scholars today believe were not part of the original text. The first twelve words of the text are on the preceding leaf. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. KJV - This translation is known as the Authorized Version or the King James Bible. Recent Posts. First, Scotts statistics are probably an amalgam of global changes and individual changes. [citation needed], KJV: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. [107] It appeared in the footnote at this place in the RSV and then in brackets in the main text of the NRSV: RSV & NRSV: But they reported briefly to Peter and those with him all that they had been told. The reason for the presence or absence of the brief doxology at the end of the Lord's Prayer is actually liturgical use. You can easily view multiple chapters of the Bible at the same time. It is mentioned in the KJV No.118 times. But this argument wont fly when we consider the last six verses of Revelation: since the Greek manuscript he was using lacked the last leaf, Erasmus had to back-translate from Latin into Greek, thereby creating seventeen textual variants in Rev 22:16-21that have no Greek support!5 That these variants were carried over in the KJV translation is problematic for KJV-only folks if they wish to deny that Erasmus was inspired. This title occupies one whole line (the book is written in double columns) and then follow the last twelve verses [i.e., the Longer Ending] still in the same hand. "[52] The UBS gives this omission a confidence rating of A. This is suitable for older children as well as adults. It was omitted from editions of the Greek New Testament at least as far back as 1729, in Daniel Mace's edition. This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth; but thou shalt meditate therein day and night, that thou mayest observe to do according to all that is written therein: for then thou shalt make thy way prosperous, and then thou shalt have good success. How do I align things in the following tabular environment? KJV: For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost. Follow Up: struct sockaddr storage initialization by network format-string. (Proverbs 17:16) "fools" setting a "price" on "wisdom" when they have "No sense" and/or they have "No heart" for it (Multiple /layered meanings), (Proverbs 17:19 b) "raises his door" Vs "makes his door high"/"exalts his gate", Deeper Understanding of (Proverbs 29:13) for mentioning God giving light on the eyes of both the poor and the oppressor. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Want to know what we're up to and when. The NIV and ESV and other versions have also now removed 45 complete verses. Verse 36 is included by very few Greek manuscripts of the Western text-type and by Old-Latin and Vulgate manuscripts.[19][20]. Here is a whole series of lecture on Bible translations by Dan Wallace, that answers this. Browse other questions tagged, Like any library, Christianity Stack Exchange offers great information, but, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Verses 44 and 46 are both lacking in ,B,C,L,W,1, and some mss of the ancient versions, but appear in somewhat later sources such as A,D,K,, some Italic mss and the Vulgate. This is solely because of this difference. Reason: The earliest Greek manuscript (Ea/E2) of the New Testament to include this verse dates from the late sixth or early seventh century[26][27] and it is only found in Western witnesses to the text with many minor variations. What is a word for the arcane equivalent of a monastery? Strangely, it is very easy to verify all of these points by simply visiting www.biblegateway.com and entering in the above verse numbers or cross referencing the words in the table below. A Jewish website http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt1401.htm has the format that the BHS uses of 4 in Joel and 3 in Malachi. peter macari age. [108] But there are a handful of other sources that contain the Shorter Ending then add the Longer Ending after it. (2 Samuel 12:27) And Joab sent messengers to David, and said, I have fought against Rabbah, and have taken the city of waters. This amounts to one one-hundredth of a percent of the text. But the words quoted above complicate this story by asserting that miraculous cures were already taking place at this pool in the absence of Jesus, owing to the unpredictable intervention of an (apparently invisible) angel. ", Mark 7:16: "If any man have ears to hear, let him hear. It is important to read the surrounding scriptures to get an understanding of the impact the omission of the above verses really have. why does the kjv have extra verses; why does the kjv have extra verses. How to Choose a Translation for All Its Worth by Fee & Strauss. [141] A theory shared by several scholars is that this pericope represents some very early tradition or folktale about Jesus, not originally found in any of the canonical Gospels, which was so popular or compelling that it was deliberately inserted into a Gospel;[142] a variant on this theory is that this anecdote was written down as a note for a sermon, perhaps in the margin of a codex or on a scrap inserted between the pages of a codex, and a subsequent copyist mistakenly incorporated it in the main text when working up a new copy. The ambiguity of the original reading has motivated some modern interpretations to attempt to identify "they"e.g., the Good News Bible, the New American Standard, the NIV, and the New RSV, have Paul and Barnabas going out and 'the people' inviting them to repeat or expand on their preaching. It seems a lot less effort just to add the clarification rather than to argue over what it's reasonable to expect people to know/be able to look up, at such length. Some of them are rather minor, some are major. (2 Samuel 12:20) Then David arose from the earth, and washed, and anointed himself, and changed his apparel, and came into the house of the LORD, and worshipped: then he came to his own house; and when he required, they set bread before him, and he did eat. Brooke Foss Westcott & Fenton John Anthony Hort, Edward F. Hills (19121981), "The King James Version Defended: A Christian View of the New Testament Manuscripts" (1956). [90] St. Jerome, in the first half of the fifth century, received a very similar query from a lady named Hedibia and responded, "Either we should reject the testimony of Mark, which is met with in scarcely any copies of the Gospel, almost all the Greek codices being without this passage, especially since it seems to narrate what contradicts the other Gospels; or else, we shall reply that both Evangelists state what is true. It only takes a minute to sign up. Reason: It is considered unlikely that these words were in the original text of the Gospel. The battle between good and evil, God and Satan. [120] Explanations aside, it is now widely (although not unanimously) accepted that St. Mark's own words end with verse 8 and anything after that was written by someone else at a later date. Press). The KJV for Isaiah 9:2 is: The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined. [Note: Different editions of the KJV show various treatments of the punctuation, especially at the end of the verses, and of capitalization, especially at the beginning of the verses. So bibleworks and websites agree. They are lacking in the "earliest and best witnesses", and several ancient Greek mss that do contain them enclose them with markings indicating doubts about their authenticity, the passage contains words or expressions that appear nowhere else in John (such as the Greek words for "at a certain season [= occasionally]" and "stirring" and "diseases"), and the mss that contain this verse differ among themselves as to the wording. He had details and, though I would say that the tone of his letter was certainly less than charitable, I thought that the content needed some investigation. The apocrypha was a part of the KJV for 274 years until being removed in 1885 A.D. A portion of these books were called . KJV: And Jesus answered and said unto to him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. [60] Expressions of doubt also appeared in the edition of Stephen Courcelles (tienne de Courcelles), in 1658, and from Johann Jakob Griesbach's edition of 1775. Another handful of minuscules 13 put it after Luke 21:38. Another well-known error is found in Jesus discourse against the religious leaders of his day, recorded in Matthew 23. Author. The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: " a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. It is because the Word of God gets it power from the spoken word. The concluding words of verse 3 but not any of verse 4 appear in D, 33 (ninth century), and some Latin manuscripts. This group of changes would qualify for Scotts font theory that he assumes I embrace.